What is logic is it beneficial to think in a logically consistent manner

In a meaningless world, does truth always have value over delusion? July 6, Comments Spread the love I care about truth if there is a God.

What is logic is it beneficial to think in a logically consistent manner

Constructivist epistemology Social constructivism holds that truth is constructed by social processes, is historically and culturally specific, and that it is in part shaped through the power struggles within a community. Constructivism views all of our knowledge as "constructed," because it does not reflect any external "transcendent" realities as a pure correspondence theory might hold.

Rather, perceptions of truth are viewed as contingent on convention, human perception, and social experience. It is believed by constructivists that representations of physical and biological reality, including racesexualityand genderare socially constructed. Giambattista Vico was among the first to claim that history and culture were man-made.

Your Answer

Hegel and Marx were among the other early proponents of the premise that truth is, or can be, socially constructed.

Marx, like many critical theorists who followed, did not reject the existence of objective truth but rather distinguished between true knowledge and knowledge that has been distorted through power or ideology.

For Marx, scientific and true knowledge is "in accordance with the dialectical understanding of history" and ideological knowledge is "an epiphenomenal expression of the relation of material forces in a given economic arrangement".

Consensus theory of truth Consensus theory holds that truth is whatever is agreed upon, or in some versions, might come to be agreed upon, by some specified group.

Such a group might include all human beings, or a subset thereof consisting of more than one person. Pragmatic theory of truth The three most influential forms of the pragmatic theory of truth were introduced around the turn of the 20th century by Charles Sanders PeirceWilliam Jamesand John Dewey.

Although Peirce uses words like concordance and correspondence to describe one aspect of the pragmatic sign relationhe is also quite explicit in saying that definitions of truth based on mere correspondence are no more than nominal definitions, which he accords a lower status than real definitions.

Defined and named by William Ernest Hockingthis variation is known as "negative pragmatism". Essentially, what works may or may not be true, but what fails cannot be true because the truth always works.

For Peirce, the idea of " As Feynman noted, an idea or theory " Pragmatism and negative pragmatism are also closely aligned with the coherence theory of truth in that any testing should not be isolated but rather incorporate knowledge from all human endeavors and experience.

What is logic is it beneficial to think in a logically consistent manner

The universe is a whole and integrated system, and testing should acknowledge and account for its diversity. As Feynman said, " Deflationary theory of truth Modern developments in the field of philosophy, starting with the relatively modern notion that a theory being old does not necessarily imply that it is completely flawless, have resulted in the rise of a new thesis: This thesis is in part a response to the common use of truth predicates e.

What is logic is it beneficial to think in a logically consistent manner

In common parlance, truth predicates are not commonly heard, and it would be interpreted as an unusual occurrence were someone to utilise a truth predicate in an everyday conversation when asserting that something is true.

Newer perspectives that take this discrepancy into account and work with sentence structures that are actually employed in common discourse can be broadly described: Among the theoretical concerns of these views is to explain away those special cases where it does appear that the concept of truth has peculiar and interesting properties.

In addition to highlighting such formal aspects of the predicate "is true", some deflationists point out that the concept enables us to express things that might otherwise require infinitely long sentences. This assertion can also be succinctly expressed by saying: What Michael says is true.

The idea that some statements are more actions than communicative statements is not as odd as it may seem. Consider, for example, that when the bride says "I do" at the appropriate time in a wedding, she is performing the act of taking this man to be her lawful wedded husband.

She is not describing herself as taking this man, but actually doing so perhaps the most thorough analysis of such "illocutionary acts" is J. Strawson holds that a similar analysis is applicable to all speech acts, not just illocutionary ones: Redundancy theory of truth According to the redundancy theory of truthasserting that a statement is true is completely equivalent to asserting the statement itself.

Redundancy theorists infer from this premise that truth is a redundant concept; that is, it is merely a word that is traditionally used in conversation or writing, generally for emphasis, but not a word that actually equates to anything in reality. This theory is commonly attributed to Frank P.

Ramseywho held that the use of words like fact and truth was nothing but a roundabout way of asserting a proposition, and that treating these words as separate problems in isolation from judgment was merely a "linguistic muddle".

A version of this theory was defended by C. Williams in his book What is Truth?.

– Ethics & Socratic Logic

Consider the analogy between the sentence "Snow is white" and the character named Snow White, both of which can be true in some sense. To a minimalist, saying "Snow is white is true" is the same as saying "Snow is white," but to say "Snow White is true" is not the same as saying "Snow White.

Philosophical skepticism and Certainty Philosophical skepticism is generally any questioning attitude or doubt towards one or more items of knowledge or belief which ascribe truth to their assertions and propositions.

Philosophical skepticism comes in various forms. Radical forms of skepticism deny that knowledge or rational belief is possible and urge us to suspend judgment regarding ascription of truth on many or all controversial matters. More moderate forms of skepticism claim only that nothing can be known with certainty, or that we can know little or nothing about the "big questions" in life, such as whether God exists or whether there is an afterlife.

Religious skepticism is "doubt concerning basic religious principles such as immortality, providence, and revelation ".Thoughts and news on transhumanism, vegetarianism, science fiction, science, philosophy, math, programming, language, consciousness and the nature of reality. After the suggestion in one of this site’s comments stating that it required more faith to be an atheist than a theist, because the non-existence of a deity can never be proven, I thought it would be fun to see if we can logically disprove the existence of “God”.

After all, we can think in an orderly manner and do so without being the least bit critical. A person who can recite the rules and regulations of Robert’s Rules of Order is thinking in an orderly way without being at all critical.

Propositional Logic | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Logical and rational thinking is trying to apply logic and/or reason to your thinking. That means you try and avoid all kinds of logical fallacies and look at all the evidence pro and contra the arguments you are bringing forth in order to induce or deduce new thoughts and ideas.

It is hugely. That which is inconsistent involves variance, discrepancy, or even contradiction, especially from the point of view of truth, reason, or . Concrete Operational ( yrs) Can think logically about objects and events.

Achieves conservation of number (age 6), mass (age 7), and weight (age 9). Classifies objects according to several features and can order them in series along a single dimension such as size.

Why Ben Shapiro Is A Total Fraud | IDEAS ON IDEAS