This was remarkable, because no commercial cellulosic ethanol facilities even existed at the time.
I want to start with some apologies. For the record, here and upfront, I apologise for having spent several years ripping up GM crops. I am also sorry that I helped to start the anti-GM movement back in the mid s, and that I thereby assisted in demonising an important technological option which can be used to benefit the environment.
As an environmentalist, and someone who believes that everyone in this world has a right to a healthy and nutritious diet of their choosing, I could not have chosen a more counter-productive path.
I now regret it completely. Well, the answer is fairly simple: I discovered science, and in the process I hope I became a better environmentalist.
Here was a big American corporation with a nasty track record, putting something new and experimental into our food without telling us.
Mixing genes between species seemed to be about as unnatural as you can get — here was humankind acquiring too much technological power; something was bound to go horribly wrong.
These genes would spread like some kind of living pollution. It was the stuff of nightmares. This was the most successful campaign I have ever been involved with.
This was also explicitly an anti-science movement. We employed a lot of imagery about scientists in their labs cackling demonically as they tinkered with the very building blocks of life. Hence the Frankenstein food tag — this absolutely was about deep-seated fears of scientific powers being used secretly for unnatural ends.
For me this anti-science environmentalism became increasingly inconsistent with my pro-science environmentalism with regard to climate change. I published my first book on global warming inand I was determined to make it scientifically credible rather than just a collection of anecdotes.
So I had to back up the story of my trip to Alaska with satellite data on sea ice, and I had to justify my pictures of disappearing glaciers in the Andes with long-term records of mass balance of mountain glaciers.
That meant I had to learn how to read scientific papers, understand basic statistics and become literate in very different fields from oceanography to paleoclimate, none of which my degree in politics and modern history helped me with a great deal. So I lectured them about the value of peer-review, about the importance of scientific consensus and how the only facts that mattered were the ones published in the most distinguished scholarly journals.
My second climate book, Six Degrees, was so sciency that it even won the Royal Society science books prize, and climate scientists I had become friendly with would joke that I knew more about the subject than them.
And yet, incredibly, at this time in I was still penning screeds in the Guardian attacking the science of GM — even though I had done no academic research on the topic, and had a pretty limited personal understanding.
Obviously this contradiction was untenable. What really threw me were some of the comments underneath my final anti-GM Guardian article. In particular one critic said to me: Are you also opposed to the wheel because because it is marketed by the big auto companies?
So I did some reading. And I discovered that one by one my cherished beliefs about GM turned out to be little more than green urban myths. It turned out that pest-resistant cotton and maize needed less insecticide.
It turned out that billions of dollars of benefits were accruing to farmers needing fewer inputs. It turned out that hybrids did that long ago, and that Terminator never happened.attheheels.com is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want.
“Never have so many scientists forecast so far into the future such fearful weather with so little risk of consequence for being wrong.” – I just made that up. There is an excellent essay over at Judith Curry’s Climate Etc. blog by Steven Mosher entitled Post Normal Science: Deadlines.
Wheat or corn kernels are ground in a hammer-mill to expose the starch, the ground grain is then mixed with water, heated briefly and enzymes are added to convert the starch to sugar using a chemical reaction called hydrolysis.
Ethanol the Fuel of the Future Essay will be conducted to Ethanol Fuel Production from Banana Waste. Hi, its 15degrees celcius in Ireland today this time last year the waterfall in town was frozen.
Whats a myth? The reduction of tangible reality from matter to form in successive steps of transformation, none of which resemble the former a.k.a, science, or experienced reality? by Judith Curry Right about now would be a good time for people who care about climate change to acknowledge our clean energy crisis.
- Mike Shellenberger Environmental Progress is an organization that I've just become familiar with. Excerpts from their About page: The mission of Environmental Progress is to build a movement of concerned. A Better Fuel - Ethanol MAG By Sarah J., Columbia, MD According to Biotour there are between billion and trillion barrels of crude petroleum oil left on the planet.